Jeremy Thomas
3/3 às 14:47
Do UFO believers need disinformation
agents?
Many times in UFO sites we
heard mentioned the term "disinformation agents". That term may give
to an unsuspecting casual reader the idea that UFO believers usually deal with
very precious and actionable knowledge/information that some other people are
trying to obfuscate and/or corrupt.
But looking at almost any UFO
site on the net a detached observer will realize that the "information
content" in these sites is very close to zero, they usually deal with no
actionable knowledge/information, essentially they deal with
"no-information", or almost equivalently they usually deal with disinformation.
When concrete and objective
procedures are presented in these sites to make direct atmospheric observations
then these procedures are rejected and the submitter labelled as desinfo agent.
For some members of these sites
direct and systematic observations are "pseudo-observations", the
real observations providing a higher level of "actionable
knowledge/information" for them are: watching their screen monitor or smartphones
and then talking about the things seen and done by others some tens of years
ago.
They get very excited by
footage with very low information content, as glowing dots in a black
background, or in general any footage taken with low magnification where
structure details of the objects under observation are not clearly seen, or by
personal "witness accounts" where what the given witness say will be
taken on faith. The information content in any of these is very low, but then
they will "complete" the missing information with their expected
preconceptions "language" using words as: crafts, formations, fleets,
intelligent controlled, triangular formation, mega structure in space, etc,
etc....
So do they really need any disinformation
agent?!
No comments:
Post a Comment