Ronald Ricardo 3/3 às 17:56 -- I found something that is going to be very important.

Ronald Ricardo

3/3 às 17:56

Hello people i found something that is going to be very important you know Franny hudson footage !!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntWQooeAXuk

I’m analyzing this ! look at this frame !!!!

Jeremy Thomas 3/3 às 16:09 -- I want to express again my admiration and respect for the work of Cristian Soldano.

Jeremy Thomas

3/3 às 16:09

This is a repost but I want to express again my admiration and respect for the work of Cristian Soldano, I am always looking for sources with "high information" content and Cristian Soldano is one source with super high information content, this is really a unique footage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCOil6QwzNE

Jeremy Thomas 3/3 às 14:47 -- Do UFO believers need disinformation agents?

Jeremy Thomas

3/3 às 14:47

Do UFO believers need disinformation agents?

Many times in UFO sites we heard mentioned the term "disinformation agents". That term may give to an unsuspecting casual reader the idea that UFO believers usually deal with very precious and actionable knowledge/information that some other people are trying to obfuscate and/or corrupt.

But looking at almost any UFO site on the net a detached observer will realize that the "information content" in these sites is very close to zero, they usually deal with no actionable knowledge/information, essentially they deal with "no-information", or almost equivalently they usually deal with disinformation.

When concrete and objective procedures are presented in these sites to make direct atmospheric observations then these procedures are rejected and the submitter labelled as desinfo agent.

For some members of these sites direct and systematic observations are "pseudo-observations", the real observations providing a higher level of "actionable knowledge/information" for them are: watching their screen monitor or smartphones and then talking about the things seen and done by others some tens of years ago.

They get very excited by footage with very low information content, as glowing dots in a black background, or in general any footage taken with low magnification where structure details of the objects under observation are not clearly seen, or by personal "witness accounts" where what the given witness say will be taken on faith. The information content in any of these is very low, but then they will "complete" the missing information with their expected preconceptions "language" using words as: crafts, formations, fleets, intelligent controlled, triangular formation, mega structure in space, etc, etc....

So do they really need any disinformation agent?!

Franny Hudson 3/3 às 12:54 -- Calling Anomalies Live!

Franny Hudson

3/3 às 12:54

https://youtu.be/FZcRP-9EWt4 

re upload of the calling I did last year and left the camcorder rolling for a response.

  Calling Anomalies Live! HD

How to Summon Anomalies 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wzR8Gn8k2Y 

This is a re upload from last year.

Jeremy Thomas 2/3 às 15:55 -- Modifying a Pan/Tilt head ...

Jeremy Thomas

2/3 às 15:55

Modifying a Pan/Tilt head for use in a dual optical system allowing relatively smooth tracking using very high optical magnification equipment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XejvLOX5slY

Jeremy Thomas 3/3 às 6:27 -- ET hypothesis or ET belief?

Jeremy Thomas 3/3 às 6:27

ET hypothesis or ET belief?  When a hypothesis is used always have temporary status, it is never final. It is a claim trying to synthesize in a single statement or idea a whole set of evidence.  If new evidence is not fully consistent with such hypothesis then the given hypothesis should be modified or replaced. That is the "normal" and expected process with any hypothesis.  But for many people the ET hypothesis is a lot more than just an hypothesis, it is a belief with a lot of emotional attachment.  That automatically takes away objectivity from anybody with emotional attachment to any hypothesis.  This emotional attachment to ETH had clouded the judgment of many Ufologists.  They simply had inflated evidence supporting their hypothesis and then they had belittled/suppressed any evidence that not fully support their beloved hypothesis, they really had been doing, ironically, wholesale suppression of evidence when many of these Ufologists frequently mention cover-ups.

Solidaevidencia Archivos 3/3 às 1:29 -- OBJETO ANOMALO EXTRAÑO DESINFLADO QUE FLOTA

Solidaevidencia Archivos

3/3 às 1:29

OBJETO ANOMALO EXTRAÑO DESINFLADO QUE FLOTA 29-02-2016

SOLIDAEVIDENCIA ARCHIVOS·THURSDAY, MARCH 3, 2016

Este objeto extraño con comparacion a un globo de helio, aparecio repentinamente sobre el lado sur del cielo flotando y girando en contra del viento, desinflado, y no cayo en ningun momento.

Este video dura poco tiempo porque tuve un inconveniente cuando estaba descargando el video y solo quedo un fragmento del mismo. De todas formas este objeto no podria flotar normalmente, debido a que no posee aire ni gas, algo sumamente llamativo.

Jeremy Thomas, desde Estados Unidos, Miami, logro una captura simiar de algo que flotaba, pero este objeto que filmo Jeremy era totalmente desinflado, y no es algo comun de observar.